<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executive bonuses &#8211; Justified?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Executive bonuses – Justified? « The Shaved Soapbox -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Executive bonuses – Justified? « The Shaved Soapbox -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldy.co.za/?p=317#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Brooks. David Brooks said: Executive bonuses – Justified? « The Shaved Soapbox http://bit.ly/lMnBv [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Brooks. David Brooks said: Executive bonuses – Justified? « The Shaved Soapbox <a href="http://bit.ly/lMnBv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/lMnBv</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldy</title>
		<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldy.co.za/?p=317#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with you, we want the good execs to join.  What you want to avoid is them making bad decisions, like Escom &amp; SAA cutting down on maintenance to make it appear like they&#039;re growing profit, while they&#039;re actually just setting up the next one for massive failure while enriching themselves.  So there has to be a solution in the middle somewhere, where good decisions get compensated, and the bad ones get ripped apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with you, we want the good execs to join.  What you want to avoid is them making bad decisions, like Escom &#038; SAA cutting down on maintenance to make it appear like they&#8217;re growing profit, while they&#8217;re actually just setting up the next one for massive failure while enriching themselves.  So there has to be a solution in the middle somewhere, where good decisions get compensated, and the bad ones get ripped apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaco Pretorius</title>
		<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaco Pretorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldy.co.za/?p=317#comment-41</guid>
		<description>If the executive is only compensated for long-term performance he probably won&#039;t join your company.  Keep in mind that a company can often have terrible results no matter what the CEO does.  For example, if the industry goes through a significant change (or a global recession) the CEO has very little influence over the company&#039;s results.  Executives know this and the best ones will only join your company if they are compensated accordingly - and these are the ones you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the executive is only compensated for long-term performance he probably won&#8217;t join your company.  Keep in mind that a company can often have terrible results no matter what the CEO does.  For example, if the industry goes through a significant change (or a global recession) the CEO has very little influence over the company&#8217;s results.  Executives know this and the best ones will only join your company if they are compensated accordingly &#8211; and these are the ones you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldy</title>
		<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Baldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldy.co.za/?p=317#comment-40</guid>
		<description>You need them to take risks to take a company forward.  It should be calculated risks, and if the exec knows that he only gets his bonus if the risks he takes pay off long term, then we&#039;re just forcing them to take ONLY calculated risks and not short term blinkered options</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need them to take risks to take a company forward.  It should be calculated risks, and if the exec knows that he only gets his bonus if the risks he takes pay off long term, then we&#8217;re just forcing them to take ONLY calculated risks and not short term blinkered options</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaco Pretorius</title>
		<link>http://baldy.co.za/post/2009/10/08/executive-bonuses-justified/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaco Pretorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldy.co.za/?p=317#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Executive compensation is quite a hot topic at the moment and I don&#039;t think there is any magic solution.  The key is that companies can&#039;t really offer low yearly compensation because they need to attract the best CEO&#039;s!  You have to compare what your company is offering to what other companies are offering.  The best solution seems to be to offer a mixture of annual compensation (salary), stock options and shares.  The problem with only offering stock options is that executives are inclined to take bigger risks - that is probably a problem with your solution as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Executive compensation is quite a hot topic at the moment and I don&#8217;t think there is any magic solution.  The key is that companies can&#8217;t really offer low yearly compensation because they need to attract the best CEO&#8217;s!  You have to compare what your company is offering to what other companies are offering.  The best solution seems to be to offer a mixture of annual compensation (salary), stock options and shares.  The problem with only offering stock options is that executives are inclined to take bigger risks &#8211; that is probably a problem with your solution as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

